The IP Strategy Summit: NYC
In the heart of New York—a global hub for commerce, media, and innovation—intellectual property leaders face a dynamic and high-stakes landscape. From AI-generated content and global brand enforcement to billion-dollar patent disputes and trade secret threats, the challenges of protecting and monetizing IP assets have never been greater. For today’s in-house counsel and legal strategists, success demands more than legal expertise—it requires adaptive, business-aligned strategies that anticipate disruption.
This year’s IP Strategy Summit: New York introduces a new, expanded format with two concurrent tracks—Patents and Trademark & Copyright—giving you the power to tailor your day to the issues that matter most. Dive deep into patent portfolio strategy, litigation trends, and trade secret protection, or explore cutting-edge approaches to brand enforcement, licensing, and copyright in the age of AI.
This is where high-level strategy meets real-world execution. Dive into discussions on building resilient patent portfolios, navigating trade secret risks, maximizing brand value through licensing and collaborations, and addressing the IP challenges posed by generative AI. Learn how leading organizations are approaching valuation, enforcement, and litigation funding to strengthen their IP posture and drive business growth.
Designed for IP professionals navigating the intersection of law, technology, and enterprise value.
* 5.5 HRS NY CLE / Per Track
- Prosecution & Portfolio Management: Building Resilient IP Strategies
- Patent Management in the Age of AI
- Trade Secrets: Hope is Not a Strategy
- Defensive Litigation in a High-Stakes Environment: Lessons from Recent Cases
- Valuation, Monetization & Funded Litigation: What In-House Counsel Need to Know
- Strategic Patent Enforcement for Operating Companies
- Global Brand Protection & Enforcement
- AI and Generative Content: Who Owns What?
- Copyright Challenges in the Digital Economy
- Parody, Free Speech & Trademark Enforcement
- Brand Value & IP Strategy in M&A, Spinouts, and Brand Expansions
- Chief IP Counsel
- Chief Legal Officer
- VP & Director of IP Strategy
- Chief, Deputy, Associate and/or Assistant General Counsel
- General Counsel
- Intellectual Property, Trademark, and Copyright Counsel
- Head of Litigation
- Director of Business and Legal Affairs
- Director/VP of Intellectual Property
- Director/VP of Licensing
- IP Counsel
- Patent Counsel
- Corporate Counsel
Agenda
Two Tracks. One Comprehensive Experience.
With two streams of content running concurrently, you may design a schedule that aligns with your goals. Focus on a single discipline or diversify your perspective by attending sessions across both the Patents and Trademarks & Copyright tracks.
One-to-One Meetings begin. If interested in participating, email info@centerforceusa.com


Puja Detjen is a partner at Patterson + Sheridan LLP who serves on the firm’s management committee. Her practice focuses on patent preparation and prosecution of both domestic and international patents, global brand protection, and IP due diligence.
Puja is able to parlay her knowledge of clients’ technology and business into a comprehensive IP strategy focused on developing and protecting their innovations and brands.
Prior to her legal career, Puja was an engineer for GE Energy supporting corporate strategy objectives across manufacturing, operations, and supply chain management. Today, she leverages her diverse industry experience to lead the way for clients seeking to align their IP efforts with a strategic plan.


Intellectual Property pattern and co-chair Jonathan S. Caplan represents clients in patent litigation, counseling and prosecution, as well as in general corporate matters involving the acquisition, sale or licensing of intellectual property rights.
Jonathan litigates patent infringement actions in federal district courts across the country, in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and in state courts, both representing patent owners seeking to enforce their rights and defending companies against allegations of infringement.


Erik Milch is a partner in the Litigation Department, co-head of the Patent Law practice and a member of the Intellectual Property and Trials group.
As a first-chair trial lawyer, Erik brings more than 25 years of experience litigating in key jurisdictions across the U.S., as well as before the International Trade Commission and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Erik litigates complex matters involving medical devices, life sciences instrumentation, pharmaceuticals, electrical and computer technology, and consumer products. He regularly counsels clients in a range of industries in connection with patent procurement, development of patent portfolios, patent licensing, valuation of patent portfolios in business transactions and transactional diligence.


Joe Drayton is a partner in the Litigation Department, co-head of the Patent law practice and a member of the Intellectual Property and Trials groups.
Joe is a first-chair trial lawyer with over two decades of experience representing some of the nation’s most prominent companies in high-stakes intellectual property (IP) and complex commercial litigation. He has successfully handled matters across a broad range of industries before state and federal courts, the International Trade Commission and arbitration tribunals including the American Arbitration Association. Joe’s practice spans all areas of IP law—patent, trade secrets, copyright, trademark, trade dress and false advertising—both domestically and internationally. He also advises clients on IP acquisition, transfer, protection and enforcement strategies.
Trade secret protection has become a critical pillar of IP strategy as companies face rising threats from employee mobility, digital collaboration, and increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks. Recent high-profile misappropriation cases and legislative changes like the EU’s new Trade Secrets Directive and U.S. DTSA updates underscore the need for proactive, cross-functional programs to safeguard sensitive information. This panel will explore how in-house teams can move beyond passive policies to implement robust trade secret identification, management, and enforcement strategies that hold up under litigation. Learn how leading companies are embedding trade secret protection into their corporate culture, contracts, and vendor relationships to stay ahead of theft and inadvertent leaks.
This Panel will Explore:
- Building a defensible trade secret program: identification, classification, and protection
- Legal and operational tools to minimize risk during employee departures and vendor engagements
- Preparing for trade secret litigation: evidence preservation and early action strategies
- Global trends shaping trade secret enforcement in the U.S., EU, and Asia


Jason Sobel is a partner in the Firm’s Intellectual Property Litigation, Trademark, Copyright & Advertising, and Technology Practice Groups. His practice spans a wide range of areas of intellectual property law, including litigation, transactions, prosecution, and other strategic matters. Jason provides intellectual property and litigation counsel to clients in numerous industries and technological disciplines, including software and internet companies; manufacturing of mechanical and electrical devices and materials; financial services; chemicals; food products and ingredients; medical devices; life sciences; semi-conductors; and consumer products.


Ms. Ksenia Takhistova is an experienced IP litigator and technology attorney who counsels clients on US intellectual property law issues across a wide variety of modern and emerging technologies. She has substantial experience in all aspects of litigation, representing both plaintiffs and defendants in patent cases, including Hatch-Waxman litigations, before the Federal District Courts, at the International Trade Commission, in post-grant proceedings at the US Patent and Trademark Office, and in appeals from these proceedings.
She has also handled other IP-related disputes, including trade secret, false advertising, and antitrust issues, in both Federal and State Courts. Ksenia represents clients in transactions, such as settlement negotiations and IP licensing discussions, and performs due diligence and opinion work, including freedom-to-operate, patentability, infringement and validity analyses. Drawing on her extensive educational and research background in the mechanical and chemical engineering arts, she is able to effectively handle disputes in technical fields, such as mechanical and medical devices, electrical and computer technology, life sciences, chemical, materials, and consumer products.


Dania Nasser is the Senior Associate General Counsel at Canon Business Process Services. Prior to working in this role she was the Business Operations and Compliance Counsel at Ralph Lauren. Dania acquired her law degree from Yale University.


Leon Medzhibovsky is a highly regarded litigator focusing on intellectual property, trade secret, software and technology related commercial disputes. He helps clients solve their most challenging business problems arising from sophisticated business and commercial matters.
The subject matter of these disputes has ranged widely across the field of complex litigation, and includes software and computer systems, systems integration, consumer products, healthcare, aviation, FinTech, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and numerous types of general business-to-business technology related litigation.
Clients also turn to Leon for his extensive experience with complex domestic and multi-jurisdictional commercial technology disputes, seeking his counsel on high-stakes transactions involving intellectual property assets and cutting-edge technologies, in such areas as joint ventures, strategic alliances, collaborations, licensing, software development and systems integration agreements.
Leon is a board observer and member of the strategy steering committee for several technology, data/machine learning and software companies. From protecting intellectual property and technology to strategic risk assessment, Leon focuses on the whole picture and provides concise, practical and business-oriented advice.




Kate focuses on litigation in a variety of areas, including intellectual property, products liability, trade secrets, and complex commercial disputes in Delaware’s state and federal courts. She has also served as counsel in significant contractual disputes filed with the American Arbitration Association and has advised on real estate litigation disputes, including a successful tax assessment appeal.
Kate has assisted the District Court of Delaware with implementing its High School Fellowship Program, which provides an opportunity for students to work in chambers with District Court judges. She was chosen for and completed the Delaware District Court’s Federal Trial Practice Seminar, a program that provides exceptional opportunities for younger lawyers in Delaware to learn and practice trial skills and to learn from mentors on the Delaware bench and other prominent jurists. Kate is also active in the Federal Bar Association and the Rodney Inns of Court.
Prior to RLF, Kate clerked for the Honorable Joseph R. Slights III in the Delaware Superior Court. In law school, Kate served as an intern for the civil division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.
If interested in participating, email info@centerforceusa.com
High-stakes defensive IP litigation requires proactive strategies to mitigate risk and protect brand integrity. Drawing from recent landmark cases—such as PTAB decisions using “settled expectations” to deny late-filed petitions and key trade secret losses—this session reveals how companies are reshaping defense playbooks amid procedural shifts. Hear how data-driven litigation analytics (e.g., Lex Machina) inform forum selection, motion timing, and strategic settlements. We’ll dissect practical approaches to anticipate threats, manage disclosure risks, and turn liability exposure into leverage for favorable outcomes.
This Panel will Explore:
- Leveraging litigation analytics for venue strategy and defense prep
- Lessons learned from new PTAB discretionary denial criteria
- Defensive tactics in trade secret disputes post-misappropriation
- Strategies for converting defensive posture into settlement leverage


Ben is a registered patent attorney and focuses on complex litigation and technology counseling.
Ben’s litigation experience includes managing complex civil litigation cases of all types, including post grant IP matters, patent, unfair competition, trademark and trade dress, copyright, property disputes, and breach of contract cases. He also has experience in cases involving preliminary injunctive relief.
His technology practice involves litigation and also counseling small and large companies on all types issues impacting their companies, including guiding IP prosecution efforts. He has counseled individuals and companies in services industries, manufacturing, telecommunications, software, food and consumables, petroleum refining, internet and media, and transportation.
Ben also maintains an active pro bono practice. His pro bono work includes counseling and litigation for veterans denied disability benefits, prisoners, home associations, housing disputes, and is part of the pro bono counsel for the Rare Genomics Institute.


Jennifer is an experienced litigator. As a partner at Delaware law firm Morris Nichols, she focuses on patent, trademark, trade secrets, and other complex intellectual property disputes in federal and state court. Her experience encompasses all aspects of litigation from outset to trial and through appeal in both lead counsel and co-counsel roles.
An MIT graduate with degrees in electrical engineering & computer science and management, she frequently draws on her technical background in her patent litigation work.


Richard (“Rick”) M. Bemben is a director in Sterne Kessler’s Electronics Practice Group and a Co-Chair of the firm’s PTAB Practice. He is a recognized leader in post-grant proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Over the last decade, Rick has been counsel in over 130 PTAB proceedings—including inter partes reviews, post-grant reviews, and covered business method reviews. He has also been counsel in more than a dozen related Federal Circuit appeals. In 2023, Patexia ranked Rick as one of the most active and best performing PTAB attorneys over the five-year period from July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2023. Notably, he was ranked as the 2nd Best Performing PTAB Attorney Representing Patent Owners, and within the Top 50 Best Performing PTAB Attorneys Overall (representing Petitioners or Patent Owners) during this five-year period. Rick often speaks and publishes on patent- and PTAB-related topics. For example, he served as Co-Editor of Sterne Kessler’s “2023 PTAB Year in Review: Analysis & Trends” report, which synthesizes key events and decisions that occurred at the PTAB and provides detailed analysis to serve as a helpful reference for those who practice before or adjacent to the PTAB. He is also contributing author of Patent Office Litigation, Second Edition, which published in 2017.


Edward is Vice President and Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property at MasterCard. He has over a decade of legal experience. Prior to MasterCard Edward held associate positions at bother Baker Botts LLP and Petterson Belknap Web & Tyler LLP. Edward earned his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and his J.D. from Cornell Law School.


Ed represents a diverse set of litigants in high-stakes matters in federal courts and at the International Trade Commission. In addition, Mr. Tulin is admitted to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, where he litigates reexamination, interference, and inter partes review proceedings. Mr. Tulin also has extensive experience with IP licensing and diligence matters, including patent portfolio analyses, freedom-to-operate opinions, and contract drafting.


The digital economy continues to stretch copyright enforcement in unexpected ways—from NFTs and streaming to user-generated content platforms. Recent cases like Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence highlight judicial scrutiny of AI training data in hotly litigated areas. Meanwhile, the U.S. Copyright Office’s 2025 AI report is shaping policy and fair use standards. This session provides a deeper understanding of digital copyright’s evolving frontiers and empowers in-house teams to future-proof enforcement strategies.
This Panel will Explore:
- Judicial trends in AI-related copyright lawsuits post-Ross Intelligence
- Policy guidance from the U.S. Copyright Office’s AI study
- Enforcement tactics for digital-first platforms and emerging media models
- Navigating fair use and transformative content disputes in the digital era


Nancy Del Pizzo is a member of Rivkin Radler’s Commercial Litigation; Intellectual Property; and Privacy, Data & Cyber Law Practice Groups. She resolves commercial disputes, including intellectual property matters such as trademark, trade dress, copyright and patent infringement, restrictive covenants and domain name disputes, misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition, false advertising, defamation and trade libel.




Smrithi Mohan is the General Counsel at Awes.me, Inc., d/b/a Awesome, the parent company of SmugMug, Flickr, and This Week In Photo. As a member of the Executive Leadership Team, she steers all legal efforts at the company, in addition to providing governance, compliance, as well as strategic operational input. At Awesome, Smrithi is developing the company’s very first innovation and intellectual property program. Prior to joining as General Counsel at Awesome, Smrithi was a Managing Attorney at Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., serving as both the Head of Legal and Compliance for Dun & Bradstreet India, and as the Head of the Global Corporate Innovation and Intellectual Property Strategy and Practice at Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., where she built and developed Dun & Bradstreet’s first intellectual property program and corporate IP strategy. She has delivered numerous presentations and spoken at national and international conferences covering a range of general legal and intellectual property-related subjects. She has also been featured in both Attorney At Law Magazine and Modern Counsel, and is also recognized as an international Top IP Leader by the IPR Gorilla. Though she earned her J.D. degree and has been a practicing attorney for many years, Smrithi also earned a Master’s degree in the field of Management from Harvard University in May 2023, achieving the Dean’s List Academic Achievement Award.




Matt’s practice is focused on intellectual property litigation (both in the district courts and at the ITC), Inter Partes Review and Post-Grant Review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. With more than 25 years of litigation experience, Matt has seen what has gone right for holders of intellectual property rights, as well as what can go wrong. His litigation expertise has allowed him to become a trusted advisor and problem solver on IP portfolio management issues. He delivers practical, battle-tested advice to more effectively manage the IP portfolios of companies both large and small.
Matt has argued and won claims before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri and district courts around the country. One of two patent attorneys on the committee to draft the Local Patent Rules for the Eastern District of Missouri, which were adopted in 2011, Matt is frequently retained to serve as local counsel in the district.


Shelly is an accomplished attorney and business executive with over 30 years of experience in the gaming, consumer products and entertainment industries. She is currently the General Counsel and Global Head of Licensing for Mob Entertainment, Inc. Prior to Mob, she was General Counsel of Big Fish Games. Shelly began her career in the console gaming industry, holding key roles at Sega of America and the PlayStation division of Sony. Shelly transitioned to mobile gaming as the Vice President of Business Development and Legal at GSN Games. Shelly is well versed in console, mobile, PC and Roblox platforms.
For operating companies, enforcing patents is more than protecting innovation—it’s about advancing business objectives while managing legal, financial, and reputational risks. As litigation costs rise and PTAB proceedings continue to reshape enforcement strategies, in-house teams are tasked with making high-stakes decisions that align with corporate priorities. This session will explore how leading companies approach patent enforcement with a strategic mindset, balancing aggressive action with practical considerations around settlement, licensing, and global jurisdictional challenges. Attendees will gain insights into building effective enforcement playbooks tailored for today’s complex IP landscape.
This Panel will Explore:
- Aligning patent enforcement strategies with corporate and competitive goals
- Evaluating when to litigate, license, or pursue alternative dispute resolution
- Managing enforcement risks, including reputational and counter-litigation concerns
- Best practices for collaboration between in-house teams, outside counsel, and litigation funders


Philip L. Hirschhorn focuses his practice on patent litigation and counseling. He prides himself on working with clients to understand their businesses thoroughly, including the ways in which intellectual property litigation affects their business objectives. Clients can rest assured that Phil will go the extra mile, both on his own and as part of a team, to help clients solve their legal challenges.
Phil’s extensive experience, spanning more than 30 years, includes bench trials, jury trials, and arbitrations. He has represented clients in traditional infringement/validity litigations as well as Hatch-Waxman (Paragraph IV) litigations. Phil also has experience handling copyright, trademark/trade dress, and trade secret litigation. Phil advises clients on commercial patent licensing agreements. The subject matter of these engagements is diverse, including chemical, pharmaceutical, consumer products, medical devices, graphics, visualization technologies, apparel, and radiotherapy software and devices.
In addition to his patent litigation experience, Phil counsels clients on the interplay between the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and district court actions. He has extensive PTAB litigation experience, having assisted both patent owners and petitioners.
Phil’s prowess in intellectual property law has earned him many accolades over the years. Managing Intellectual Property has named him an IP Star nearly every year since 2013, and he has been named among IAM’s Patent 1000 list several times. He also has been named a New York Super Lawyer in the practice area of patent litigation.
Phil earned a bachelor’s degree from Columbia College and his law degree from Fordham University School of Law, where he also served as Associate Editor of the Fordham Law Review and Editor of the Fordham Environmental Law Report.
Phil is a frequent speaker on IP litigation topics such as recent developments in Paragraph IV litigation, patent damages, and trade secret litigation. He is a current Co-Chair of the PTAB/TTAB committee of the Federal Circuit Bar Association and the immediate past chair of the Patents Committee of the New York City Bar Association.


Clement “Clem” Naples is a partner in Cleary Gottlieb’s New York office and a nationally recognized first-chair trial lawyer specializing in patent and trade secret litigation in federal and state courts as well as the International Trade Commission. Widely sought for “bet-the-company” cases, his most recent matter—a multibillion-dollar dispute over semiconductor manufacturing secrets—has been described as “one of the most complex trade secret battles in the semiconductor industry.” With a background as a lead optical engineer at Silicon Valley Group Lithography Systems (now ASML), Clem brings deep technical insight into semiconductor manufacturing, optical systems, and modeling tools. He has litigated a broad range of cases—spanning cybersecurity, wireless communications, automotive technology, and video tech—and is frequently consulted by business leaders on IP strategy, including in Global Finance Magazine’s “Pricing and Protecting Patents.” He joined Cleary as a partner in 2025 after an 18-year tenure at another international law firm


Robin Davis is a Director in the Intellectual Property Finance Group at Fortress, where she is responsible for the growing portfolio of litigation funding investments in IP litigations. Fortress’s IP Group specializes in providing bespoke capital solutions to patent owners, including through private equity, credit, and litigation funding investments. Robin works closely with patentholders and their litigation counsel to structure appropriate litigation finance deals and oversees the portfolio of funded investments.
Prior to transitioning into litigation finance, Robin spent 10 years as a patent litigator, including at Quinn Emanuel and as a partner at Radulescu LLP. Her litigation experience involved complicated matters for both plaintiffs and defendants in district court, the ITC and PTAB, and concerned technology ranging from optical networking components to smartphone software features.
Robin spent five years at Woodsford Group, a London-based litigation funder. She served as the Chief Investment Officer responsible for Woodsford’s US investment portfolio and a member of their board of directors.
Just prior to joining Fortress, Robin was Senior Vice President – M&A, Contingent Liability for Ethos Specialty Insurance Services, where she acted as an underwriter for contingent and litigation risk insurance products.


EVAN H. LANGDON is a Partner at Fabricant LLP in Washington, DC. Mr. Langdon is the Chair of Fabricant LLP’s International Trade Commission (ITC) practice. His work focuses on Section 337 investigations before the ITC, intellectual property litigation in U.S. District Courts, and appeals before the Federal Circuit. He is adept at navigating the unique and complex procedural and technical issues of Section 337 investigations, and the rigorous economic analyses required for domestic industry and public interest. Recognized among the nation’s top ITC Section 337 practitioners by Chambers USA, Managing IP, and Business Today, Mr. Langdon has represented clients in more than forty Section 337 investigations in all phases of litigation. Mr. Langdon graduated, magna cum laude, from the Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law.
Parody remains a flashpoint between First Amendment freedoms and brand protection. The Supreme Court’s decision in Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products reaffirmed that parody does not grant an automatic pass—it still triggers confusion analysis. Across the IP community, creative businesses and legal teams are rethinking enforcement strategies in light of mixed signals from courts. This session tackles the big questions: how can brands defend their trademarks without stifling expression?
This Panel will Explore:
- Defining the parody line: balancing creativity with brand clarity
- Assessing reputational and free-speech risks in trademark enforcement
- Global approaches to trademark parody and dilution law


Melissa Klein is Senior IP Counsel at Danone, a leading food and beverage company, with brands such as Dannon, OIKOS, Silk, International Delight and SToK. Melissa oversees the company’s brand portfolio in North America, including prosecuting trademark applications; enforcement; licensing opportunities and advising the marketing teams on “right time engagement” and media campaigns. Prior to working at Danone, she was IP Counsel at David Yurman.




If interested in participating, email info@centerforceusa.com
As innovation cycles accelerate and geopolitical and regulatory pressures mount, in-house IP teams must evolve their prosecution and portfolio management practices to build resilience. It’s no longer about filing volume—it’s about aligning filings with business priorities, anticipating litigation risks, and ensuring your portfolio remains a strategic asset in an uncertain environment. This panel explores how leading organizations are leveraging data analytics, global insights, and proactive portfolio pruning to drive value and mitigate vulnerabilities. Gain actionable strategies to strengthen your IP posture while optimizing resources for long-term success.
This Panel will Explore:
- Developing prosecution strategies that reflect corporate and innovation goals
- Streamlining global portfolio management for efficiency and impact
- Using analytics to identify strengths, gaps, and cost-saving opportunities
- Preparing portfolios to support enforcement, licensing, and M&A objectives


Lance Hochhauser is Senior Intellectual Property Counsel at Prove Identity, Inc., overseeing all facets of Prove’s intellectual property. He is also managing Prove’s AI policy and has stood up a model risk management program to standardize responses Prove provides to clients.
Prior to his time at Prove, Lance was Associate General Counsel at SWIM USA; Intellectual Property Counsel at IQVIA; and Patent Attorney – Team Lead at IBM.
Lance earned his J.D. from Emory University School of Law and his bachelor degree in chemical engineering from Vanderbilt University. Lance is admitted to practice law in New York and is also admitted to practice before the USPTO.




Puja Detjen is a partner at Patterson + Sheridan LLP who serves on the firm’s management committee. Her practice focuses on patent preparation and prosecution of both domestic and international patents, global brand protection, and IP due diligence.
Puja is able to parlay her knowledge of clients’ technology and business into a comprehensive IP strategy focused on developing and protecting their innovations and brands.
Prior to her legal career, Puja was an engineer for GE Energy supporting corporate strategy objectives across manufacturing, operations, and supply chain management. Today, she leverages her diverse industry experience to lead the way for clients seeking to align their IP efforts with a strategic plan.


Andrew G. Haberman is a Partner at Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, has been a Member of the firm since 2019, and has been practicing intellectual property law since 2011. With a degree in mechanical engineering, Andrew focuses his practice on patent portfolio development, portfolio management, counseling, freedom-to-operate, invalidity, and infringement analysis and opinions, and related matters. Andrew’s counseling has assisted with multiple high-stakes M&A deals and Andrew’s advocacy has resulted in successful outcomes before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Prior to joining Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, Andrew prosecuted patents at an IP firm in Alexandria. Additionally, while in law school, Andrew worked at the U.S. District Court of Maryland, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Office of IP.
With global commerce shifting online at record speed, brand abuse has become a cross-border battleground. Counterfeiters and infringers now exploit e-commerce platforms and weak enforcement regimes, requiring nimble global responses. This session dissects modern tactics—from AI-driven monitoring to cross-jurisdiction takedowns—and explores how recent international agreements are affecting enforcement strategies. Learn how innovative brands are leveraging tech, partnerships, and data to stay ahead in the global IP enforcement game.
This Panel will Explore:
- Emerging e-commerce enforcement tactics using AI-powered monitoring
- Key developments in international trademark treaties and enforcement frameworks
- Strategies for tackling infringement in high-risk jurisdictions
- Building scalable, global brand protection programs


Sophie Abae is Senior Counsel for Flock Safety, a technology company focused on solving and eliminating crime through its suite of unique software, products, and wide network of customers. In her role, she manages the company’s expanding intellectual property portfolio, including patents, trademarks, and trade secrets, and is a senior member of the commercial revenue legal team. Sophie is proud to have had the privilege of entering into tech early in her career, giving her a fresh perspective on what it means to be a legal partner to a growing business. A South Florida native and a graduate of Boston College undergrad and law school, Sophie is thrilled to now call New York City her home.


Michelle has built an impressive track-record practicing in trademark, copyright, patent, unfair competition/false advertising, anti-counterfeiting/anti-piracy, internet, and fashion and wearable technology law.
Michelle’s clients span a broad range of industries including fashion and retail, food and beverage, computer software and hardware, educational services, financial and consulting services, pharmaceutical, and media and entertainment. Michelle is distinguished not only by the victories she has achieved for her clients but also for the wider influence and interest her cases have generated. She represents clients in state and federal courts, at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and before the International Trade Commission. She has also successfully obtained preliminary injunctions and ex parte seizure orders on behalf of her clients, and works closely with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and law enforcement in coordinated anti-counterfeiting efforts. She has argued and won numerous federal and state court appeals, including the Second Circuit’s seminal famous marks case of ITC Ltd v. Punchgini, Inc. Michelle has also successfully represented numerous companies in connection with design patent disputes in industries ranging from consumer products to industrial products.
Complementing her litigation work, Michelle’s practice also includes counseling and opinions, trademark and trade dress prosecution, devising cost-effective brand protection programs, negotiating licenses, IP acquisitions, and cobranding agreements on behalf of clients, and counseling clients on the use of social media and other online platforms to market and sell their goods and services.


Rachelle Laroche is Vice President, Chief Commercial and IP Counsel at LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Inc., where she leads commercial and intellectual property strategy for the company’s U.S. operations.
Previously, she spent a decade at Johnson & Johnson as Assistant General Counsel – Trademarks and Board Attorney for the Vogue Haircare Franchise. Earlier in her career, she served as Associate Counsel – Intellectual Property at Burberry, focusing on anti-counterfeiting initiatives, and was an associate in the False Advertising and Trademark group at Proskauer Rose.
She is a co-founder and board member of the Unlocked Foundation and serves on the Board of Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts. Within LVMH, she co-chairs the Northeast Chapter of EllesVMH, the company’s gender equity employee resource group.


Kimiya Shams is an executive lawyer with several years of work experience in international intellectual property law, new technologies and corporate transactions. Ms Shams has worked at international law firms and companies across Sweden, France, and the US. Ms. Shams holds two Master of Laws (LLM) degrees from Stockholm University and Stanford Law School, specialising in law, science, and technology. She has also studied intellectual property law and economics at Harvard and Oxford. With extensive experience advising global companies – from start-ups to public firms – on intellectual property strategy and technology transactions, she is passionate about the intersection of law, technology, luxury goods, and business. Alongside her legal career, Ms Shams has published numerous articles on intellectual property in leading outlets like Forbes and The Business of Fashion. She is also a guest lecturer at Columbia Law School, HEC Paris, EDHEC Paris, and ESCP Paris.
AI technologies are not only transforming innovation but also challenging the very foundations of patent law. From questions of inventorship under DABUS-style cases to enforcement complexities where AI-generated inventions blur lines, in-house counsel must navigate untested legal and ethical terrain. This session dives into managing AI-related IP risks, adapting patent strategy for AI-heavy portfolios, and anticipating changes in global regulations. Gain clarity on protecting AI innovations while preparing for potential litigation and legislative shifts.
This Panel will Explore:
- Legal implications of AI inventorship and ownership disputes
- Strategies for drafting robust AI-related patents amid shifting standards
- Global trends in AI patentability and enforcement challenges
- Best practices for mitigating risks in AI-heavy R&D pipelines




Daniel S. Block is a director in Sterne Kessler’s Electronics Practice Group. Dan’s practice primarily focuses on patent and anti-counterfeiting litigation at the International Trade Commission and in Federal district court. Dan has been integral in designing and implementing anti-counterfeiting measures for numerous international brands, with a focus on cost-neutral enforcement strategies. He has also served as counsel in over 110 post-grant proceedings at the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board. His technical expertise covers many areas of computing including: computer graphics, networking communications, web services, complex computer architectures, and storage systems.
Dan’s brand enforcement work includes obtaining judgments against hundreds of defendants selling counterfeit products of major consumer brands. He has obtained judgments totaling over 50 million dollars, and seized or stopped the sales of tens of thousands of counterfeit items over the Internet. Dan has served as an advisor to associates participating in the PTAB’s Legal Experience and Advancement Program (LEAP), which provides associates with training and development opportunities in PTAB proceedings, including oral argument.


Ajay A. Jagtiani possesses 27 years of experience in all phases of patent prosecution, including patentability, validity and infringement opinions, procurement of international patents, client counseling, licensing, agreement negotiations, and mergers/acquisitions.
Ajay supports numerous clients in biotechnology, including diagnostics, genomics, immunotherapy, proteomics, pharmaceuticals and other microbiology techniques. He has extensive experience in the academic world, providing assistance in intellectual property matters and technology transfer to educational institutions around the globe.
In the state arena, he has advised the Secretary of Technology for the Commonwealth of Virginia regarding intellectual property matters, and he has drafted proposed intellectual property legislation.
At the federal level, Ajay has advised such government agencies and laboratories as the Department of Energy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Mines, Naval Medical Research and Development Command, Naval Command and Control Center, NASA, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratory, and the Naval Research Laboratory.
Whether acquiring a startup, launching a spin-out, or expanding into new markets, brand assets are central to deal value—and deal risk. From trademark diligence to copyright strategy during integrations, missteps are costly. This session brings clarity with real-world M&A case studies, actionable frameworks, and lessons for safeguarding brand value across transformations.
This Panel will Explore:
- Conducting trademark and copyright diligence in deals and spinouts
- Managing brand ownership during corporate restructuring or carve-outs
- Aligning IP strategy with brand expansion and international growth
- Best practices for protecting brand value during integrations or divestitures


Carina Harrison is a distinguished brand developer and strategic leader with over a decade of experience in managing globally recognized brands. Her expertise lies in media and talent-led brands, particularly excelling in large-scale Direct-to-Retail programs for major retailers such as Target, Walmart, Amazon, Ulta, American Eagle, and Kohl’s.
Currently, as the Vice President and Head of Licensing & Partnerships at Hello Sunshine, Carina is responsible for building and implementing strategies to amplify the brand’s mission to center women in storytelling through strategic partnerships, brand collaborations, and licensed consumer products. Before advancement, she held Vice President, Commercial Operations for The Home Edit, where she led their organizing services, drove new revenue streams, and optimized retailer relationships.
Carina’s previous experience as Vice President of Brand Management at Creative Artists Agency (CAA) involved leading the growth and execution of consumer product programs for high-profile clients, including Draper James, Drew Barrymore, Lil Wayne, and Netflix’s licensing programs for popular series such as Stranger Things, Bridgerton, and Squid Game.
Her career began at Tesco, the largest retailer in the UK, as an apparel buyer, following her graduation with top honors in Buying Management. In 2017, she relocated to New York City to focus on developing Drew Barrymore’s Flower brand portfolio into a cross-category Home DTR with Walmart.
Renowned for her ability to build high-performing teams and holistic management approach, Carina combines her expertise in licensing, retail management, and brand development with exceptional communication skills. This has solidified her reputation as a trusted leader in the industry, with a proven track record of driving brand expansion and sustainable growth for her clients.


Daniel Ilan’s practice focuses on intellectual property, cybersecurity and privacy, as well as artificial intelligence. He has significant experience in representing leading technology companies and other multinational corporations and private equity firms in technology-related issues, including AI, arising in transactional contexts, particularly transactions involving licensing or acquisition of or investment in cutting-edge technologies. He also regularly advises companies on diverse AI, IP, privacy and cybersecurity issues, both for strategic planning and day-to-day compliance. Daniel is an industry thought leader and regularly writes and speaks about AI issues and the IP, privacy and data security implications of generative AI. He is a member of the Advisory Board of The Federmann Cyber Security Research Center – Cyber-Law Program at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.


Nishat Ruiter is General Counsel of TED conferences, a nonprofit organization that believes passionately
in the power of ideas to change attitudes, lives and, ultimately, the world. Through creativity, and a deep
respect for TED’s mission, Nishat’s work is centered on ensuring that TED’s legal requirements are met
through a combination of practical and creative solutions that meets its needs, while still retaining the
authentic TED voice across every area where possible. She manages the legal issues with respect to
TED’s licensing, partnerships, TM, brand protection, TED’s code of conduct, data privacy, copyright,
transactions, and all corporate legal matters. Prior to TED, she worked for over 15 years as in house
counsel, and in private practice including working as Associate General Counsel at CA Technologies, a
Fortune 500 software technology company in a variety of roles including managing the North American
legal department of 25 lawyers and contract managers, managing all integration issues for 7 companies
as lead counsel and advising on regulatory compliance issues for government sales, marketing,
advertising, and social media.
Nishat serves as a member of the Board for International School Services, a not for profit providing
international schools and teachers global and education support, including diversity and leadership
frameworks, on the editorial board of the London-based International In-house Counsel Journal and a
founding member of One Hillsborough, a grassroots not for profit created to support oneness of humanity
in her community through education, advocacy and programming with other like minded organizations
and stakeholders in her town. Nishat holds a BA in Political Science from Rutgers University, a JD from
Delaware Law School (formerly Widener) and international certificates of practice in the Netherlands .
If interested in participating, email info@centerforceusa.com
For in-house legal teams, intellectual property is no longer just a defensive shield—it’s a dynamic asset that can drive revenue, secure strategic partnerships, and support high-stakes enforcement. Successfully leveraging your IP portfolio requires a deep understanding of valuation methodologies, monetization opportunities, and the expectations of litigation funders. This session provides a comprehensive roadmap for in-house counsel to unlock the full potential of their IP, navigate the due diligence process, and structure agreements that align with corporate priorities while mitigating risks.
This Panel will Explore:
- Practical approaches to valuing patents, trade secrets, and emerging technologies
- Strategies for monetizing IP through licensing, sales, and strategic partnerships
- What litigation funders evaluate and how to prepare your case for approval
- Building agreements and funder relationships that preserve control and align with business goals




Imtiaz Khan is a Director at Houlihan Lokey, where he leads the firm’s Intellectual Property (IP) Valuation & Advisory Services practice. With over a decade of experience in valuation, modeling, and strategic consulting, he helps clients quantify, monetize, and optimize the value of IP and other intangible assets across dynamic sectors including fintech, software, semiconductors, digital assets, life sciences, and industrials.
Operating within a leading global investment bank, Mr. Khan’s work uniquely bridges technical IP valuation with capital markets, M&A, and financing strategy. His expertise spans IP valuation, strategy, licensing, and IP-backed financing. His work transforms complex IP assets into business-critical levers for growth and competitive advantage.
Before joining Houlihan Lokey, Mr. Khan was a Senior Director at Aon’s IP Solutions practice, where he led valuation efforts for several IP-backed financings and played a key role in supporting companies, insurers, and investors with IP portfolio valuations and risk analyses.


Glenn Forbis is a Chambers®-rated litigator and the leader of Harness IP’s Litigation Practice Group. With more than 200 intellectual property cases handled across the country—including 18 Federal Circuit appeals (15 favorable results) and 9 cases to verdict—he is known for developing focused strategies and delivering persuasive presentations in court. Glenn has secured numerous multimillion-dollar verdicts and settlements for clients in patent, trademark, and copyright matters, including a string of favorable jury verdicts in recent years. He is regularly recognized by Best Lawyers, Super Lawyers, Managing Intellectual Property, and AIM as one of the nation’s leading IP litigators.


Richard Brophy has a proven track record of trying and winning complex intellectual property cases across the United States. His practice encompasses many areas of complex civil litigation, but he focuses primarily on disputes involving patents, trademarks, copyrights, and antitrust violations. Drawing on his expansive background as an aerospace engineer and computer scientist, Richard stands out by distilling complex technical and legal issues in ways that judges and juries can easily understand. In addition to providing strategic defense to clients who become litigation targets, Richard has demonstrated a talent for accomplishing the challenging task of enforcing his clients’ intellectual property.


Sarah Tsou is the global head of Omni Bridgeway’s award-winning intellectual property business, overseeing Omni Bridgeway’s IP portfolio and team of dedicated IP professionals.
Chambers has repeatedly recognized Sarah in Band 1 for Litigation Funding (Intellectual Property), noting that she is “quite simply, brilliant…she is a big picture, game changing thinker” who is “a huge asset to Omni’s overall business” and “one of the genuine superstars in the litigation finance industry.” Omni’s IP business is also ranked by Chambers in Band 1 for Intellectual Property. Sarah is described as an “unparalleled leader in the world of litigation finance” by IAM, which has included her in its most prestigious rankings, and has repeatedly been named a Thought Leader by Who’s Who Legal. Sarah is also identified as a key leader within Legal 500’s 2025 Tier 1 ranking of Omni Bridgeway’s U.S. business noting the strength of the company’s global IP service.
Sarah has been invited to speak on litigation funding issues by prominent industry organizations such as the International Legal Finance Association, Federal Circuit Bar Association, Delaware Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, Intellectual Property Owners Association, International Intellectual Property Society, IPWatchdog, and New York City Bar Association. Additionally, she is quoted frequently in publications such as Law360, Bloomberg Law, and Managing IP. She also sits on the Steering Committee of Women of Litigation Finance (WOLF).
Prior to joining the company’s New York office in 2019, Sarah was a partner in the intellectual property practice group at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, focusing on patent litigation. In addition to handling patent disputes spanning a broad range of technologies and industries, she also led trade secret and trademark litigation teams and counseled clients in corporate acquisitions, licensing matters, and other transactions.
Sarah approaches litigation funding deal evaluation and diligence with the expertise of a litigator who has spent over a dozen years representing clients in all aspects of complex litigation from inception to trial. She has advised clients ranging from start-ups to Fortune 100 companies on risk, cost analysis, IP portfolio and market analysis, and strategy, and she understands the factors that companies and law firms weigh when deciding whether to engage in litigation. Her substantial case evaluation and trial experience inform her ability to structure funding deals that allow alignment of risk between all parties to the deal. Having secured significant verdicts and resolutions for clients in industries including computer software, electronics, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, biotechnology, and oilfield services, she offers valuable insights to Omni Bridgeway’s funded clients and their counsel when they need strategic advice during the course of litigation.
Sarah earned her J.D. from New York University School of Law and her B.A. from Washington University in St. Louis, majoring in both Biology and Psychology and graduating summa cum laude with Highest Honors.
AI-driven counterfeiting, impersonation, and domain abuse demand faster triage and clearer ROI. This live demonstration shows how practitioners move from detection to prioritized actions, unify online/offline enforcement, and report outcomes that matter to leadership. (Includes examples using Corsearch’s TrademarkNow for screening/clearance/monitoring and Zeal 2.0 for AI-native detection and enforcement.)
You’ll see:
- A triage matrix for “pursue vs. monitor vs. de-prioritize”
- Cross-channel enforcement workflows (marketplaces, social, domains)
- Practical KPI/ROI snapshots legal and brand teams can reuse
- How screening/clearance/monitoring connects to enforcement pipelines
Rotating, 20-minute discussions hosted by a topic expert
Roundtable 1: Topic TBA
Hosted by: Richards, Layton, and Finger, P.A.
Roundtable 2: When AI Meets Trademark Prosecution: Risks You Can’t Ignore
Hosted by: Lindsay Korotkin, Partner, ArentFox Schiff
Roundtable 3: Tools To Help You Improve Prosecution Outcomes
Hosted by: Ajay Jagtiani, Principal, Miles & Stockbridge
Roundtable 4: Update on the Upheaval at the PTAB and Tips for Navigating the Uncertainty
Hosted by: Philip Hirschhorn and Erin Dunston, Partners, Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel, LLP
Roundtable 5: TBD
Hosted by: Andrew G. Haberman (Member of the Firm) and Patrick Finnan (Managing Partner), Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC
Roundtable 6: TBD
Hosted by: Evan Langdon, Partner, Fabricant LLP


Over the course of her over twenty-year career, Erin M. Dunston’s practice has been a purposeful mix of patent prosecution and litigation. Having handled many patent litigations, Erin recognizes how every word in prosecution may ultimately be analyzed by the fact-finder and thus strives for efficient, law- and science-driven prosecution. Her extensive prosecution experience, in turn, is invaluable when analyzing prosecution documents and issues as part of a litigation. With a background in biochemistry, she concentrates her practice primarily in the fields of biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and associated computer technology.
In terms of patent prosecution, counseling, and strategy, Erin learns her clients’ businesses and how a given project will advance the client’s business objectives, from both offensive and defensive standpoints. Erin also works closely with clients to satisfy budget constraints and assist in leveraging and monetizing patent assets.
To date, Erin has handled more than 20 district court litigations and more than 25 inter partes reviews (IPRs) and more than 40 interferences before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (P.T.A.B). Assisting both patent owners and putative infringers/petitioners, this experience ranges from pre-filing analyses all the way through appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Her deep experience in patent law has been recognized by several leading IP organizations and awards programs. Erin has been selected for inclusion among The Best Lawyers in America each year since 2018. She also has been recognized in IAM’s Patent 1000 list – a best-in-class listing of patent prosecution, licensing, and litigation practitioners. For several years, including for 2021, she has been named an IP Star by Managing Intellectual Property and a Leading Intellectual Property Lawyer by Chambers USA. Erin also received Lawyer Monthly’s Women in Law 2016 Award for her contributions to the practice of biotechnology law.
Erin is the Co-Chair of the firm’s Post-Grant Group.


Philip L. Hirschhorn focuses his practice on patent litigation and counseling. He prides himself on working with clients to understand their businesses thoroughly, including the ways in which intellectual property litigation affects their business objectives. Clients can rest assured that Phil will go the extra mile, both on his own and as part of a team, to help clients solve their legal challenges.
Phil’s extensive experience, spanning more than 30 years, includes bench trials, jury trials, and arbitrations. He has represented clients in traditional infringement/validity litigations as well as Hatch-Waxman (Paragraph IV) litigations. Phil also has experience handling copyright, trademark/trade dress, and trade secret litigation. Phil advises clients on commercial patent licensing agreements. The subject matter of these engagements is diverse, including chemical, pharmaceutical, consumer products, medical devices, graphics, visualization technologies, apparel, and radiotherapy software and devices.
In addition to his patent litigation experience, Phil counsels clients on the interplay between the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and district court actions. He has extensive PTAB litigation experience, having assisted both patent owners and petitioners.
Phil’s prowess in intellectual property law has earned him many accolades over the years. Managing Intellectual Property has named him an IP Star nearly every year since 2013, and he has been named among IAM’s Patent 1000 list several times. He also has been named a New York Super Lawyer in the practice area of patent litigation.
Phil earned a bachelor’s degree from Columbia College and his law degree from Fordham University School of Law, where he also served as Associate Editor of the Fordham Law Review and Editor of the Fordham Environmental Law Report.
Phil is a frequent speaker on IP litigation topics such as recent developments in Paragraph IV litigation, patent damages, and trade secret litigation. He is a current Co-Chair of the PTAB/TTAB committee of the Federal Circuit Bar Association and the immediate past chair of the Patents Committee of the New York City Bar Association.


Lindsay’s practice focuses on trademark, trade dress, copyright, right of publicity, and art market litigation, prosecution, and transactions. She represents and counsels clients ranging from Fortune 10 companies to individuals and family businesses across a wide array of industries, including: fashion, beauty & retail; art, media, publishing, music & entertainment; food, alcoholic beverage & health; architecture, interior design & real estate; and technology, among others.
In the litigation space, Lindsay represents clients in connection with trademark, copyright, and design patent infringement, defamation, breach of contract, and other related claims in federal and state court. She also works closely with foreign counsel to oversee her clients’ foreign disputes and to coordinate claims and defenses when those disputes span around the world.
In the prosecution space, Lindsay helps clients obtain trademark and copyright registrations and manages worldwide IP portfolios in an array of fields, including for one of the largest companies in the world. She also provides day-to-day counseling and advice on issues including trademark, copyright, moral rights, and right of publicity protection and enforceability, in addition to performing high-volume global trademark clearances for names, logos, and designs.
In the transactional space, Lindsay has extensive experience drafting and negotiating a wide array of agreements across industries. She also advises artists, creative professionals, property owners, and real estate developers on the applicability of and compliance with the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA), 17 U.S.C. § 106(a), including in connection with site-specific artwork.


Ajay A. Jagtiani possesses 27 years of experience in all phases of patent prosecution, including patentability, validity and infringement opinions, procurement of international patents, client counseling, licensing, agreement negotiations, and mergers/acquisitions.
Ajay supports numerous clients in biotechnology, including diagnostics, genomics, immunotherapy, proteomics, pharmaceuticals and other microbiology techniques. He has extensive experience in the academic world, providing assistance in intellectual property matters and technology transfer to educational institutions around the globe.
In the state arena, he has advised the Secretary of Technology for the Commonwealth of Virginia regarding intellectual property matters, and he has drafted proposed intellectual property legislation.
At the federal level, Ajay has advised such government agencies and laboratories as the Department of Energy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Mines, Naval Medical Research and Development Command, Naval Command and Control Center, NASA, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratory, and the Naval Research Laboratory.


Andrew G. Haberman is a Partner at Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, has been a Member of the firm since 2019, and has been practicing intellectual property law since 2011. With a degree in mechanical engineering, Andrew focuses his practice on patent portfolio development, portfolio management, counseling, freedom-to-operate, invalidity, and infringement analysis and opinions, and related matters. Andrew’s counseling has assisted with multiple high-stakes M&A deals and Andrew’s advocacy has resulted in successful outcomes before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Prior to joining Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, Andrew prosecuted patents at an IP firm in Alexandria. Additionally, while in law school, Andrew worked at the U.S. District Court of Maryland, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Office of IP.


Patrick Finnan has been ESF’s managing partner since 2002 and has been involved in the IP field since 1992. With an advanced degree in Electrical Engineering, Patrick brings a wealth of experience to counseling clients on a wide range of IP matters, representing clients in AIA post-grant proceedings, developing and implementing international portfolio management strategies, conducting FTO analyses, preparing invalidity and non-infringement opinions, performing IP due diligence for M&A transactions, and negotiating and drafting IP agreements.
Before embarking on a career in IP, Patrick gained several years of practical engineering experience in the defense sector as a systems engineer for Westinghouse Electric Corporation, now Northrop Grumman Corporation. After serving as a Patent Examiner, Patrick began practicing law at a large IP firm before joining ESF.


EVAN H. LANGDON is a Partner at Fabricant LLP in Washington, DC. Mr. Langdon is the Chair of Fabricant LLP’s International Trade Commission (ITC) practice. His work focuses on Section 337 investigations before the ITC, intellectual property litigation in U.S. District Courts, and appeals before the Federal Circuit. He is adept at navigating the unique and complex procedural and technical issues of Section 337 investigations, and the rigorous economic analyses required for domestic industry and public interest. Recognized among the nation’s top ITC Section 337 practitioners by Chambers USA, Managing IP, and Business Today, Mr. Langdon has represented clients in more than forty Section 337 investigations in all phases of litigation. Mr. Langdon graduated, magna cum laude, from the Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law.
Speakers


Jason Sobel is a partner in the Firm’s Intellectual Property Litigation, Trademark, Copyright & Advertising, and Technology Practice Groups. His practice spans a wide range of areas of intellectual property law, including litigation, transactions, prosecution, and other strategic matters. Jason provides intellectual property and litigation counsel to clients in numerous industries and technological disciplines, including software and internet companies; manufacturing of mechanical and electrical devices and materials; financial services; chemicals; food products and ingredients; medical devices; life sciences; semi-conductors; and consumer products.


Erik Milch is a partner in the Litigation Department, co-head of the Patent Law practice and a member of the Intellectual Property and Trials group.
As a first-chair trial lawyer, Erik brings more than 25 years of experience litigating in key jurisdictions across the U.S., as well as before the International Trade Commission and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Erik litigates complex matters involving medical devices, life sciences instrumentation, pharmaceuticals, electrical and computer technology, and consumer products. He regularly counsels clients in a range of industries in connection with patent procurement, development of patent portfolios, patent licensing, valuation of patent portfolios in business transactions and transactional diligence.


Joe Drayton is a partner in the Litigation Department, co-head of the Patent law practice and a member of the Intellectual Property and Trials groups.
Joe is a first-chair trial lawyer with over two decades of experience representing some of the nation’s most prominent companies in high-stakes intellectual property (IP) and complex commercial litigation. He has successfully handled matters across a broad range of industries before state and federal courts, the International Trade Commission and arbitration tribunals including the American Arbitration Association. Joe’s practice spans all areas of IP law—patent, trade secrets, copyright, trademark, trade dress and false advertising—both domestically and internationally. He also advises clients on IP acquisition, transfer, protection and enforcement strategies.


Puja Detjen is a partner at Patterson + Sheridan LLP who serves on the firm’s management committee. Her practice focuses on patent preparation and prosecution of both domestic and international patents, global brand protection, and IP due diligence.
Puja is able to parlay her knowledge of clients’ technology and business into a comprehensive IP strategy focused on developing and protecting their innovations and brands.
Prior to her legal career, Puja was an engineer for GE Energy supporting corporate strategy objectives across manufacturing, operations, and supply chain management. Today, she leverages her diverse industry experience to lead the way for clients seeking to align their IP efforts with a strategic plan.


Ajay A. Jagtiani possesses 27 years of experience in all phases of patent prosecution, including patentability, validity and infringement opinions, procurement of international patents, client counseling, licensing, agreement negotiations, and mergers/acquisitions.
Ajay supports numerous clients in biotechnology, including diagnostics, genomics, immunotherapy, proteomics, pharmaceuticals and other microbiology techniques. He has extensive experience in the academic world, providing assistance in intellectual property matters and technology transfer to educational institutions around the globe.
In the state arena, he has advised the Secretary of Technology for the Commonwealth of Virginia regarding intellectual property matters, and he has drafted proposed intellectual property legislation.
At the federal level, Ajay has advised such government agencies and laboratories as the Department of Energy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Mines, Naval Medical Research and Development Command, Naval Command and Control Center, NASA, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratory, and the Naval Research Laboratory.


Philip L. Hirschhorn focuses his practice on patent litigation and counseling. He prides himself on working with clients to understand their businesses thoroughly, including the ways in which intellectual property litigation affects their business objectives. Clients can rest assured that Phil will go the extra mile, both on his own and as part of a team, to help clients solve their legal challenges.
Phil’s extensive experience, spanning more than 30 years, includes bench trials, jury trials, and arbitrations. He has represented clients in traditional infringement/validity litigations as well as Hatch-Waxman (Paragraph IV) litigations. Phil also has experience handling copyright, trademark/trade dress, and trade secret litigation. Phil advises clients on commercial patent licensing agreements. The subject matter of these engagements is diverse, including chemical, pharmaceutical, consumer products, medical devices, graphics, visualization technologies, apparel, and radiotherapy software and devices.
In addition to his patent litigation experience, Phil counsels clients on the interplay between the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and district court actions. He has extensive PTAB litigation experience, having assisted both patent owners and petitioners.
Phil’s prowess in intellectual property law has earned him many accolades over the years. Managing Intellectual Property has named him an IP Star nearly every year since 2013, and he has been named among IAM’s Patent 1000 list several times. He also has been named a New York Super Lawyer in the practice area of patent litigation.
Phil earned a bachelor’s degree from Columbia College and his law degree from Fordham University School of Law, where he also served as Associate Editor of the Fordham Law Review and Editor of the Fordham Environmental Law Report.
Phil is a frequent speaker on IP litigation topics such as recent developments in Paragraph IV litigation, patent damages, and trade secret litigation. He is a current Co-Chair of the PTAB/TTAB committee of the Federal Circuit Bar Association and the immediate past chair of the Patents Committee of the New York City Bar Association.


Ben is a registered patent attorney and focuses on complex litigation and technology counseling.
Ben’s litigation experience includes managing complex civil litigation cases of all types, including post grant IP matters, patent, unfair competition, trademark and trade dress, copyright, property disputes, and breach of contract cases. He also has experience in cases involving preliminary injunctive relief.
His technology practice involves litigation and also counseling small and large companies on all types issues impacting their companies, including guiding IP prosecution efforts. He has counseled individuals and companies in services industries, manufacturing, telecommunications, software, food and consumables, petroleum refining, internet and media, and transportation.
Ben also maintains an active pro bono practice. His pro bono work includes counseling and litigation for veterans denied disability benefits, prisoners, home associations, housing disputes, and is part of the pro bono counsel for the Rare Genomics Institute.


Nancy Del Pizzo is a member of Rivkin Radler’s Commercial Litigation; Intellectual Property; and Privacy, Data & Cyber Law Practice Groups. She resolves commercial disputes, including intellectual property matters such as trademark, trade dress, copyright and patent infringement, restrictive covenants and domain name disputes, misappropriation of trade secrets and unfair competition, false advertising, defamation and trade libel.


Michelle has built an impressive track-record practicing in trademark, copyright, patent, unfair competition/false advertising, anti-counterfeiting/anti-piracy, internet, and fashion and wearable technology law.
Michelle’s clients span a broad range of industries including fashion and retail, food and beverage, computer software and hardware, educational services, financial and consulting services, pharmaceutical, and media and entertainment. Michelle is distinguished not only by the victories she has achieved for her clients but also for the wider influence and interest her cases have generated. She represents clients in state and federal courts, at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and before the International Trade Commission. She has also successfully obtained preliminary injunctions and ex parte seizure orders on behalf of her clients, and works closely with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and law enforcement in coordinated anti-counterfeiting efforts. She has argued and won numerous federal and state court appeals, including the Second Circuit’s seminal famous marks case of ITC Ltd v. Punchgini, Inc. Michelle has also successfully represented numerous companies in connection with design patent disputes in industries ranging from consumer products to industrial products.
Complementing her litigation work, Michelle’s practice also includes counseling and opinions, trademark and trade dress prosecution, devising cost-effective brand protection programs, negotiating licenses, IP acquisitions, and cobranding agreements on behalf of clients, and counseling clients on the use of social media and other online platforms to market and sell their goods and services.


Lance Hochhauser is Senior Intellectual Property Counsel at Prove Identity, Inc., overseeing all facets of Prove’s intellectual property. He is also managing Prove’s AI policy and has stood up a model risk management program to standardize responses Prove provides to clients.
Prior to his time at Prove, Lance was Associate General Counsel at SWIM USA; Intellectual Property Counsel at IQVIA; and Patent Attorney – Team Lead at IBM.
Lance earned his J.D. from Emory University School of Law and his bachelor degree in chemical engineering from Vanderbilt University. Lance is admitted to practice law in New York and is also admitted to practice before the USPTO.


Sophie Abae is Senior Counsel for Flock Safety, a technology company focused on solving and eliminating crime through its suite of unique software, products, and wide network of customers. In her role, she manages the company’s expanding intellectual property portfolio, including patents, trademarks, and trade secrets, and is a senior member of the commercial revenue legal team. Sophie is proud to have had the privilege of entering into tech early in her career, giving her a fresh perspective on what it means to be a legal partner to a growing business. A South Florida native and a graduate of Boston College undergrad and law school, Sophie is thrilled to now call New York City her home.




Ms. Ksenia Takhistova is an experienced IP litigator and technology attorney who counsels clients on US intellectual property law issues across a wide variety of modern and emerging technologies. She has substantial experience in all aspects of litigation, representing both plaintiffs and defendants in patent cases, including Hatch-Waxman litigations, before the Federal District Courts, at the International Trade Commission, in post-grant proceedings at the US Patent and Trademark Office, and in appeals from these proceedings.
She has also handled other IP-related disputes, including trade secret, false advertising, and antitrust issues, in both Federal and State Courts. Ksenia represents clients in transactions, such as settlement negotiations and IP licensing discussions, and performs due diligence and opinion work, including freedom-to-operate, patentability, infringement and validity analyses. Drawing on her extensive educational and research background in the mechanical and chemical engineering arts, she is able to effectively handle disputes in technical fields, such as mechanical and medical devices, electrical and computer technology, life sciences, chemical, materials, and consumer products.




Over the course of her over twenty-year career, Erin M. Dunston’s practice has been a purposeful mix of patent prosecution and litigation. Having handled many patent litigations, Erin recognizes how every word in prosecution may ultimately be analyzed by the fact-finder and thus strives for efficient, law- and science-driven prosecution. Her extensive prosecution experience, in turn, is invaluable when analyzing prosecution documents and issues as part of a litigation. With a background in biochemistry, she concentrates her practice primarily in the fields of biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and associated computer technology.
In terms of patent prosecution, counseling, and strategy, Erin learns her clients’ businesses and how a given project will advance the client’s business objectives, from both offensive and defensive standpoints. Erin also works closely with clients to satisfy budget constraints and assist in leveraging and monetizing patent assets.
To date, Erin has handled more than 20 district court litigations and more than 25 inter partes reviews (IPRs) and more than 40 interferences before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (P.T.A.B). Assisting both patent owners and putative infringers/petitioners, this experience ranges from pre-filing analyses all the way through appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Her deep experience in patent law has been recognized by several leading IP organizations and awards programs. Erin has been selected for inclusion among The Best Lawyers in America each year since 2018. She also has been recognized in IAM’s Patent 1000 list – a best-in-class listing of patent prosecution, licensing, and litigation practitioners. For several years, including for 2021, she has been named an IP Star by Managing Intellectual Property and a Leading Intellectual Property Lawyer by Chambers USA. Erin also received Lawyer Monthly’s Women in Law 2016 Award for her contributions to the practice of biotechnology law.
Erin is the Co-Chair of the firm’s Post-Grant Group.




Carina Harrison is a distinguished brand developer and strategic leader with over a decade of experience in managing globally recognized brands. Her expertise lies in media and talent-led brands, particularly excelling in large-scale Direct-to-Retail programs for major retailers such as Target, Walmart, Amazon, Ulta, American Eagle, and Kohl’s.
Currently, as the Vice President and Head of Licensing & Partnerships at Hello Sunshine, Carina is responsible for building and implementing strategies to amplify the brand’s mission to center women in storytelling through strategic partnerships, brand collaborations, and licensed consumer products. Before advancement, she held Vice President, Commercial Operations for The Home Edit, where she led their organizing services, drove new revenue streams, and optimized retailer relationships.
Carina’s previous experience as Vice President of Brand Management at Creative Artists Agency (CAA) involved leading the growth and execution of consumer product programs for high-profile clients, including Draper James, Drew Barrymore, Lil Wayne, and Netflix’s licensing programs for popular series such as Stranger Things, Bridgerton, and Squid Game.
Her career began at Tesco, the largest retailer in the UK, as an apparel buyer, following her graduation with top honors in Buying Management. In 2017, she relocated to New York City to focus on developing Drew Barrymore’s Flower brand portfolio into a cross-category Home DTR with Walmart.
Renowned for her ability to build high-performing teams and holistic management approach, Carina combines her expertise in licensing, retail management, and brand development with exceptional communication skills. This has solidified her reputation as a trusted leader in the industry, with a proven track record of driving brand expansion and sustainable growth for her clients.


Jennifer is an experienced litigator. As a partner at Delaware law firm Morris Nichols, she focuses on patent, trademark, trade secrets, and other complex intellectual property disputes in federal and state court. Her experience encompasses all aspects of litigation from outset to trial and through appeal in both lead counsel and co-counsel roles.
An MIT graduate with degrees in electrical engineering & computer science and management, she frequently draws on her technical background in her patent litigation work.


Daniel S. Block is a director in Sterne Kessler’s Electronics Practice Group. Dan’s practice primarily focuses on patent and anti-counterfeiting litigation at the International Trade Commission and in Federal district court. Dan has been integral in designing and implementing anti-counterfeiting measures for numerous international brands, with a focus on cost-neutral enforcement strategies. He has also served as counsel in over 110 post-grant proceedings at the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board. His technical expertise covers many areas of computing including: computer graphics, networking communications, web services, complex computer architectures, and storage systems.
Dan’s brand enforcement work includes obtaining judgments against hundreds of defendants selling counterfeit products of major consumer brands. He has obtained judgments totaling over 50 million dollars, and seized or stopped the sales of tens of thousands of counterfeit items over the Internet. Dan has served as an advisor to associates participating in the PTAB’s Legal Experience and Advancement Program (LEAP), which provides associates with training and development opportunities in PTAB proceedings, including oral argument.




Dania Nasser is the Senior Associate General Counsel at Canon Business Process Services. Prior to working in this role she was the Business Operations and Compliance Counsel at Ralph Lauren. Dania acquired her law degree from Yale University.


Richard (“Rick”) M. Bemben is a director in Sterne Kessler’s Electronics Practice Group and a Co-Chair of the firm’s PTAB Practice. He is a recognized leader in post-grant proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Over the last decade, Rick has been counsel in over 130 PTAB proceedings—including inter partes reviews, post-grant reviews, and covered business method reviews. He has also been counsel in more than a dozen related Federal Circuit appeals. In 2023, Patexia ranked Rick as one of the most active and best performing PTAB attorneys over the five-year period from July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2023. Notably, he was ranked as the 2nd Best Performing PTAB Attorney Representing Patent Owners, and within the Top 50 Best Performing PTAB Attorneys Overall (representing Petitioners or Patent Owners) during this five-year period. Rick often speaks and publishes on patent- and PTAB-related topics. For example, he served as Co-Editor of Sterne Kessler’s “2023 PTAB Year in Review: Analysis & Trends” report, which synthesizes key events and decisions that occurred at the PTAB and provides detailed analysis to serve as a helpful reference for those who practice before or adjacent to the PTAB. He is also contributing author of Patent Office Litigation, Second Edition, which published in 2017.


Leon Medzhibovsky is a highly regarded litigator focusing on intellectual property, trade secret, software and technology related commercial disputes. He helps clients solve their most challenging business problems arising from sophisticated business and commercial matters.
The subject matter of these disputes has ranged widely across the field of complex litigation, and includes software and computer systems, systems integration, consumer products, healthcare, aviation, FinTech, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and numerous types of general business-to-business technology related litigation.
Clients also turn to Leon for his extensive experience with complex domestic and multi-jurisdictional commercial technology disputes, seeking his counsel on high-stakes transactions involving intellectual property assets and cutting-edge technologies, in such areas as joint ventures, strategic alliances, collaborations, licensing, software development and systems integration agreements.
Leon is a board observer and member of the strategy steering committee for several technology, data/machine learning and software companies. From protecting intellectual property and technology to strategic risk assessment, Leon focuses on the whole picture and provides concise, practical and business-oriented advice.




Imtiaz Khan is a Director at Houlihan Lokey, where he leads the firm’s Intellectual Property (IP) Valuation & Advisory Services practice. With over a decade of experience in valuation, modeling, and strategic consulting, he helps clients quantify, monetize, and optimize the value of IP and other intangible assets across dynamic sectors including fintech, software, semiconductors, digital assets, life sciences, and industrials.
Operating within a leading global investment bank, Mr. Khan’s work uniquely bridges technical IP valuation with capital markets, M&A, and financing strategy. His expertise spans IP valuation, strategy, licensing, and IP-backed financing. His work transforms complex IP assets into business-critical levers for growth and competitive advantage.
Before joining Houlihan Lokey, Mr. Khan was a Senior Director at Aon’s IP Solutions practice, where he led valuation efforts for several IP-backed financings and played a key role in supporting companies, insurers, and investors with IP portfolio valuations and risk analyses.


Melissa Klein is Senior IP Counsel at Danone, a leading food and beverage company, with brands such as Dannon, OIKOS, Silk, International Delight and SToK. Melissa oversees the company’s brand portfolio in North America, including prosecuting trademark applications; enforcement; licensing opportunities and advising the marketing teams on “right time engagement” and media campaigns. Prior to working at Danone, she was IP Counsel at David Yurman.


Lindsay’s practice focuses on trademark, trade dress, copyright, right of publicity, and art market litigation, prosecution, and transactions. She represents and counsels clients ranging from Fortune 10 companies to individuals and family businesses across a wide array of industries, including: fashion, beauty & retail; art, media, publishing, music & entertainment; food, alcoholic beverage & health; architecture, interior design & real estate; and technology, among others.
In the litigation space, Lindsay represents clients in connection with trademark, copyright, and design patent infringement, defamation, breach of contract, and other related claims in federal and state court. She also works closely with foreign counsel to oversee her clients’ foreign disputes and to coordinate claims and defenses when those disputes span around the world.
In the prosecution space, Lindsay helps clients obtain trademark and copyright registrations and manages worldwide IP portfolios in an array of fields, including for one of the largest companies in the world. She also provides day-to-day counseling and advice on issues including trademark, copyright, moral rights, and right of publicity protection and enforceability, in addition to performing high-volume global trademark clearances for names, logos, and designs.
In the transactional space, Lindsay has extensive experience drafting and negotiating a wide array of agreements across industries. She also advises artists, creative professionals, property owners, and real estate developers on the applicability of and compliance with the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA), 17 U.S.C. § 106(a), including in connection with site-specific artwork.


Kate focuses on litigation in a variety of areas, including intellectual property, products liability, trade secrets, and complex commercial disputes in Delaware’s state and federal courts. She has also served as counsel in significant contractual disputes filed with the American Arbitration Association and has advised on real estate litigation disputes, including a successful tax assessment appeal.
Kate has assisted the District Court of Delaware with implementing its High School Fellowship Program, which provides an opportunity for students to work in chambers with District Court judges. She was chosen for and completed the Delaware District Court’s Federal Trial Practice Seminar, a program that provides exceptional opportunities for younger lawyers in Delaware to learn and practice trial skills and to learn from mentors on the Delaware bench and other prominent jurists. Kate is also active in the Federal Bar Association and the Rodney Inns of Court.
Prior to RLF, Kate clerked for the Honorable Joseph R. Slights III in the Delaware Superior Court. In law school, Kate served as an intern for the civil division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.


Glenn Forbis is a Chambers®-rated litigator and the leader of Harness IP’s Litigation Practice Group. With more than 200 intellectual property cases handled across the country—including 18 Federal Circuit appeals (15 favorable results) and 9 cases to verdict—he is known for developing focused strategies and delivering persuasive presentations in court. Glenn has secured numerous multimillion-dollar verdicts and settlements for clients in patent, trademark, and copyright matters, including a string of favorable jury verdicts in recent years. He is regularly recognized by Best Lawyers, Super Lawyers, Managing Intellectual Property, and AIM as one of the nation’s leading IP litigators.


Rachelle Laroche is Vice President, Chief Commercial and IP Counsel at LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Inc., where she leads commercial and intellectual property strategy for the company’s U.S. operations.
Previously, she spent a decade at Johnson & Johnson as Assistant General Counsel – Trademarks and Board Attorney for the Vogue Haircare Franchise. Earlier in her career, she served as Associate Counsel – Intellectual Property at Burberry, focusing on anti-counterfeiting initiatives, and was an associate in the False Advertising and Trademark group at Proskauer Rose.
She is a co-founder and board member of the Unlocked Foundation and serves on the Board of Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts. Within LVMH, she co-chairs the Northeast Chapter of EllesVMH, the company’s gender equity employee resource group.


Clement “Clem” Naples is a partner in Cleary Gottlieb’s New York office and a nationally recognized first-chair trial lawyer specializing in patent and trade secret litigation in federal and state courts as well as the International Trade Commission. Widely sought for “bet-the-company” cases, his most recent matter—a multibillion-dollar dispute over semiconductor manufacturing secrets—has been described as “one of the most complex trade secret battles in the semiconductor industry.” With a background as a lead optical engineer at Silicon Valley Group Lithography Systems (now ASML), Clem brings deep technical insight into semiconductor manufacturing, optical systems, and modeling tools. He has litigated a broad range of cases—spanning cybersecurity, wireless communications, automotive technology, and video tech—and is frequently consulted by business leaders on IP strategy, including in Global Finance Magazine’s “Pricing and Protecting Patents.” He joined Cleary as a partner in 2025 after an 18-year tenure at another international law firm


Daniel Ilan’s practice focuses on intellectual property, cybersecurity and privacy, as well as artificial intelligence. He has significant experience in representing leading technology companies and other multinational corporations and private equity firms in technology-related issues, including AI, arising in transactional contexts, particularly transactions involving licensing or acquisition of or investment in cutting-edge technologies. He also regularly advises companies on diverse AI, IP, privacy and cybersecurity issues, both for strategic planning and day-to-day compliance. Daniel is an industry thought leader and regularly writes and speaks about AI issues and the IP, privacy and data security implications of generative AI. He is a member of the Advisory Board of The Federmann Cyber Security Research Center – Cyber-Law Program at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.


Robin Davis is a Director in the Intellectual Property Finance Group at Fortress, where she is responsible for the growing portfolio of litigation funding investments in IP litigations. Fortress’s IP Group specializes in providing bespoke capital solutions to patent owners, including through private equity, credit, and litigation funding investments. Robin works closely with patentholders and their litigation counsel to structure appropriate litigation finance deals and oversees the portfolio of funded investments.
Prior to transitioning into litigation finance, Robin spent 10 years as a patent litigator, including at Quinn Emanuel and as a partner at Radulescu LLP. Her litigation experience involved complicated matters for both plaintiffs and defendants in district court, the ITC and PTAB, and concerned technology ranging from optical networking components to smartphone software features.
Robin spent five years at Woodsford Group, a London-based litigation funder. She served as the Chief Investment Officer responsible for Woodsford’s US investment portfolio and a member of their board of directors.
Just prior to joining Fortress, Robin was Senior Vice President – M&A, Contingent Liability for Ethos Specialty Insurance Services, where she acted as an underwriter for contingent and litigation risk insurance products.


Kimiya Shams is an executive lawyer with several years of work experience in international intellectual property law, new technologies and corporate transactions. Ms Shams has worked at international law firms and companies across Sweden, France, and the US. Ms. Shams holds two Master of Laws (LLM) degrees from Stockholm University and Stanford Law School, specialising in law, science, and technology. She has also studied intellectual property law and economics at Harvard and Oxford. With extensive experience advising global companies – from start-ups to public firms – on intellectual property strategy and technology transactions, she is passionate about the intersection of law, technology, luxury goods, and business. Alongside her legal career, Ms Shams has published numerous articles on intellectual property in leading outlets like Forbes and The Business of Fashion. She is also a guest lecturer at Columbia Law School, HEC Paris, EDHEC Paris, and ESCP Paris.


Richard Brophy has a proven track record of trying and winning complex intellectual property cases across the United States. His practice encompasses many areas of complex civil litigation, but he focuses primarily on disputes involving patents, trademarks, copyrights, and antitrust violations. Drawing on his expansive background as an aerospace engineer and computer scientist, Richard stands out by distilling complex technical and legal issues in ways that judges and juries can easily understand. In addition to providing strategic defense to clients who become litigation targets, Richard has demonstrated a talent for accomplishing the challenging task of enforcing his clients’ intellectual property.


Andrew G. Haberman is a Partner at Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, has been a Member of the firm since 2019, and has been practicing intellectual property law since 2011. With a degree in mechanical engineering, Andrew focuses his practice on patent portfolio development, portfolio management, counseling, freedom-to-operate, invalidity, and infringement analysis and opinions, and related matters. Andrew’s counseling has assisted with multiple high-stakes M&A deals and Andrew’s advocacy has resulted in successful outcomes before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Prior to joining Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, Andrew prosecuted patents at an IP firm in Alexandria. Additionally, while in law school, Andrew worked at the U.S. District Court of Maryland, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Office of IP.


Edward is Vice President and Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property at MasterCard. He has over a decade of legal experience. Prior to MasterCard Edward held associate positions at bother Baker Botts LLP and Petterson Belknap Web & Tyler LLP. Edward earned his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and his J.D. from Cornell Law School.


Smrithi Mohan is the General Counsel at Awes.me, Inc., d/b/a Awesome, the parent company of SmugMug, Flickr, and This Week In Photo. As a member of the Executive Leadership Team, she steers all legal efforts at the company, in addition to providing governance, compliance, as well as strategic operational input. At Awesome, Smrithi is developing the company’s very first innovation and intellectual property program. Prior to joining as General Counsel at Awesome, Smrithi was a Managing Attorney at Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., serving as both the Head of Legal and Compliance for Dun & Bradstreet India, and as the Head of the Global Corporate Innovation and Intellectual Property Strategy and Practice at Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., where she built and developed Dun & Bradstreet’s first intellectual property program and corporate IP strategy. She has delivered numerous presentations and spoken at national and international conferences covering a range of general legal and intellectual property-related subjects. She has also been featured in both Attorney At Law Magazine and Modern Counsel, and is also recognized as an international Top IP Leader by the IPR Gorilla. Though she earned her J.D. degree and has been a practicing attorney for many years, Smrithi also earned a Master’s degree in the field of Management from Harvard University in May 2023, achieving the Dean’s List Academic Achievement Award.


Sarah Tsou is the global head of Omni Bridgeway’s award-winning intellectual property business, overseeing Omni Bridgeway’s IP portfolio and team of dedicated IP professionals.
Chambers has repeatedly recognized Sarah in Band 1 for Litigation Funding (Intellectual Property), noting that she is “quite simply, brilliant…she is a big picture, game changing thinker” who is “a huge asset to Omni’s overall business” and “one of the genuine superstars in the litigation finance industry.” Omni’s IP business is also ranked by Chambers in Band 1 for Intellectual Property. Sarah is described as an “unparalleled leader in the world of litigation finance” by IAM, which has included her in its most prestigious rankings, and has repeatedly been named a Thought Leader by Who’s Who Legal. Sarah is also identified as a key leader within Legal 500’s 2025 Tier 1 ranking of Omni Bridgeway’s U.S. business noting the strength of the company’s global IP service.
Sarah has been invited to speak on litigation funding issues by prominent industry organizations such as the International Legal Finance Association, Federal Circuit Bar Association, Delaware Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, Intellectual Property Owners Association, International Intellectual Property Society, IPWatchdog, and New York City Bar Association. Additionally, she is quoted frequently in publications such as Law360, Bloomberg Law, and Managing IP. She also sits on the Steering Committee of Women of Litigation Finance (WOLF).
Prior to joining the company’s New York office in 2019, Sarah was a partner in the intellectual property practice group at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, focusing on patent litigation. In addition to handling patent disputes spanning a broad range of technologies and industries, she also led trade secret and trademark litigation teams and counseled clients in corporate acquisitions, licensing matters, and other transactions.
Sarah approaches litigation funding deal evaluation and diligence with the expertise of a litigator who has spent over a dozen years representing clients in all aspects of complex litigation from inception to trial. She has advised clients ranging from start-ups to Fortune 100 companies on risk, cost analysis, IP portfolio and market analysis, and strategy, and she understands the factors that companies and law firms weigh when deciding whether to engage in litigation. Her substantial case evaluation and trial experience inform her ability to structure funding deals that allow alignment of risk between all parties to the deal. Having secured significant verdicts and resolutions for clients in industries including computer software, electronics, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, biotechnology, and oilfield services, she offers valuable insights to Omni Bridgeway’s funded clients and their counsel when they need strategic advice during the course of litigation.
Sarah earned her J.D. from New York University School of Law and her B.A. from Washington University in St. Louis, majoring in both Biology and Psychology and graduating summa cum laude with Highest Honors.


EVAN H. LANGDON is a Partner at Fabricant LLP in Washington, DC. Mr. Langdon is the Chair of Fabricant LLP’s International Trade Commission (ITC) practice. His work focuses on Section 337 investigations before the ITC, intellectual property litigation in U.S. District Courts, and appeals before the Federal Circuit. He is adept at navigating the unique and complex procedural and technical issues of Section 337 investigations, and the rigorous economic analyses required for domestic industry and public interest. Recognized among the nation’s top ITC Section 337 practitioners by Chambers USA, Managing IP, and Business Today, Mr. Langdon has represented clients in more than forty Section 337 investigations in all phases of litigation. Mr. Langdon graduated, magna cum laude, from the Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law.


Patrick Finnan has been ESF’s managing partner since 2002 and has been involved in the IP field since 1992. With an advanced degree in Electrical Engineering, Patrick brings a wealth of experience to counseling clients on a wide range of IP matters, representing clients in AIA post-grant proceedings, developing and implementing international portfolio management strategies, conducting FTO analyses, preparing invalidity and non-infringement opinions, performing IP due diligence for M&A transactions, and negotiating and drafting IP agreements.
Before embarking on a career in IP, Patrick gained several years of practical engineering experience in the defense sector as a systems engineer for Westinghouse Electric Corporation, now Northrop Grumman Corporation. After serving as a Patent Examiner, Patrick began practicing law at a large IP firm before joining ESF.




Ed represents a diverse set of litigants in high-stakes matters in federal courts and at the International Trade Commission. In addition, Mr. Tulin is admitted to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, where he litigates reexamination, interference, and inter partes review proceedings. Mr. Tulin also has extensive experience with IP licensing and diligence matters, including patent portfolio analyses, freedom-to-operate opinions, and contract drafting.


Intellectual Property pattern and co-chair Jonathan S. Caplan represents clients in patent litigation, counseling and prosecution, as well as in general corporate matters involving the acquisition, sale or licensing of intellectual property rights.
Jonathan litigates patent infringement actions in federal district courts across the country, in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and in state courts, both representing patent owners seeking to enforce their rights and defending companies against allegations of infringement.








Matt’s practice is focused on intellectual property litigation (both in the district courts and at the ITC), Inter Partes Review and Post-Grant Review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. With more than 25 years of litigation experience, Matt has seen what has gone right for holders of intellectual property rights, as well as what can go wrong. His litigation expertise has allowed him to become a trusted advisor and problem solver on IP portfolio management issues. He delivers practical, battle-tested advice to more effectively manage the IP portfolios of companies both large and small.
Matt has argued and won claims before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri and district courts around the country. One of two patent attorneys on the committee to draft the Local Patent Rules for the Eastern District of Missouri, which were adopted in 2011, Matt is frequently retained to serve as local counsel in the district.




Shelly is an accomplished attorney and business executive with over 30 years of experience in the gaming, consumer products and entertainment industries. She is currently the General Counsel and Global Head of Licensing for Mob Entertainment, Inc. Prior to Mob, she was General Counsel of Big Fish Games. Shelly began her career in the console gaming industry, holding key roles at Sega of America and the PlayStation division of Sony. Shelly transitioned to mobile gaming as the Vice President of Business Development and Legal at GSN Games. Shelly is well versed in console, mobile, PC and Roblox platforms.


Nishat Ruiter is General Counsel of TED conferences, a nonprofit organization that believes passionately
in the power of ideas to change attitudes, lives and, ultimately, the world. Through creativity, and a deep
respect for TED’s mission, Nishat’s work is centered on ensuring that TED’s legal requirements are met
through a combination of practical and creative solutions that meets its needs, while still retaining the
authentic TED voice across every area where possible. She manages the legal issues with respect to
TED’s licensing, partnerships, TM, brand protection, TED’s code of conduct, data privacy, copyright,
transactions, and all corporate legal matters. Prior to TED, she worked for over 15 years as in house
counsel, and in private practice including working as Associate General Counsel at CA Technologies, a
Fortune 500 software technology company in a variety of roles including managing the North American
legal department of 25 lawyers and contract managers, managing all integration issues for 7 companies
as lead counsel and advising on regulatory compliance issues for government sales, marketing,
advertising, and social media.
Nishat serves as a member of the Board for International School Services, a not for profit providing
international schools and teachers global and education support, including diversity and leadership
frameworks, on the editorial board of the London-based International In-house Counsel Journal and a
founding member of One Hillsborough, a grassroots not for profit created to support oneness of humanity
in her community through education, advocacy and programming with other like minded organizations
and stakeholders in her town. Nishat holds a BA in Political Science from Rutgers University, a JD from
Delaware Law School (formerly Widener) and international certificates of practice in the Netherlands .
Sponsors

Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP
Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP is an IP boutique whose roots run deep in the domestic and international IP communities. Panitch provides litigation, licensing, and strategic counseling services relating to patents across all areas of science, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Panitch’s team of attorneys and agents form close attorney-client relationships and tailor their services to meet unique client needs.

GISH PLLC
https://www.gishpllc.com/

Patterson + Sheridan
Patterson + Sheridan LLP is a boutique IP firm with eight offices nationwide. Our firm’s broad and deep technical expertise sets us apart with 80+ attorneys, patent agents, and technical advisors spanning disciplines in engineering, physics, computer science, biology, materials science, and chemistry. P+S combines technical expertise with an in-depth understanding of intellectual property law and our clients’ business objectives to provide a pragmatic, efficient approach to support licensing and litigation efforts.
With a focus on patent preparation and prosecution since our beginning, P+S has formed decades-long partnerships with companies working seamlessly together to build, leverage, and protect their IP assets. P+S also works with some of the world’s best-known brands, providing cost-effective IP strategies and protection for a range of assets.

Fabricant LLP
At Fabricant LLP, our mission is to provide the absolute best legal services in the most complex and challenging cases. We devote whatever resources are necessary to bring about a successful resolution—whether through trial or settlement. While success and winning every case is our goal, nothing takes a back seat to being responsive, on a daily basis, to our clients.
Our Partners have over 80 years of combined experience litigating the toughest cases throughout the United States against the largest global technology companies, including the biggest names in smartphones, semiconductors, automotive, LED lighting, internet, GPS services and medical devices, consumer electronics, among many others.
Our associate team is a diverse group of highly trained and skilled litigators, most with technology degrees and backgrounds.

DLA Piper
With a portfolio of services to match every stage of the business lifecycle, DLA Piper combines practice area knowledge with modern industry insights and an expansive global footprint in a way that no other firm can. Our solutions are tailored and seamless – and ready to meet your toughest challenges. We’re guided by a simple belief – that we’re only as successful as our clients are. That’s why we fully invest in your success by working with you to deliver creative solutions, exceptional value, and peace of mind.
DLA Piper has more than 90 offices and 4,900 lawyers worldwide. Our deep capabilities and broad global platform and mind-set produce exceptional results for our clients around the world. In the US, we are located in all key markets and offer a full range of services. We represent many of the world’s leading companies, including multinational, Global 1000 and FTSE 250 companies, in a wide range of industries.

Arent Fox Schiff LLP
Founded in 1942, Arent Fox Schiff is internationally recognized in core practice areas where business and the law intersect. With more than 430 lawyers and professionals, the firm provides strategic legal counsel and multidisciplinary solutions to a global roster of corporations, governments, and trade associations.
https://www.afslaw.com/

Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Recognized as a premier Delaware law firm, Morris Nichols handles bet-the-company, high-stakes matters in the four key areas of corporate litigation, alternative entities and corporate counseling, bankruptcy and restructuring, and intellectual property litigation. The firm is regularly involved as lead counsel or co-counsel in matters of national and international significance, as well as those affecting its immediate community

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox is an intellectual property law firm of more than 175 professionals devoted to providing high value patent and trademark legal services. For 40 years, we have helped companies build, defend, and enforce worldwide IP portfolios from Washington, DC. Sterne Kessler’s service model is built on the unrivaled technical depth of its professionals, who hold over 50 Ph.D.’s and over 100 advanced technical degrees.

Richards, Layton & Finger
Defining Delaware law since 1899, Richards, Layton & Finger helps clients navigate complex issues and the intricacies of Delaware law. The firm has participated in groundbreaking cases defining Delaware corporate law, and its lawyers have long played crucial roles in drafting and amending the state’s influential business statutes. Richards Layton advises global companies, business partnerships, financial institutions, local businesses, and individuals across a wide range of practices, including corporate law, alternative entities, commercial law, bankruptcy and restructuring, commercial real estate, tax, trusts and estates, and litigation. In addition, Richards Layton is nationally recognized for tackling some of the most difficult, large-scale intellectual property matters that emerge in the Delaware District Court, representing both plaintiffs and defendants in complex patent infringement, trade secret, and trademark cases.

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, LLP
Patterson Belknap delivers a full range of services, including intellectual property. The firm’s attorneys advise clients in all aspects of IP including patent, copyright, trademark, trade secrets, and complex “bet-the-company” patent disputes. The firm has handled some of the most notable patent cases and our clients have receivedsome of the largest awards and settlements in patent cases. Many of our IP attorneys have scientific and technical backgrounds as well as industry experience in fields such as chemistry, biochemistry, molecular and cell biology, biotechnology, statistics, mathematics, electro-mechanical computer technology, metallurgical and electrical engineering, semiconductor manufacturing, electro-optical circuits and associated software. Patterson Belknap was named “Intellectual Property Practice Group of the Year” by Law360 and is consistently ranked inChambers USA for IP and patent litigation.

Miles & Stockbridge
Miles & Stockbridge helps businesses worldwide maximize the strategic value of their innovations in all areas of technology and science while adding value to their balance sheet. The team litigates clients’ most important disputes, manages global portfolios and handles complex transactions that have significant outcomes for many of the most recognized brands.
Our IP team at Miles & Stockbridge is experienced in procuring, managing, and maximizing intellectual property (IP) value through prosecution and transactions. These include trade secrets, patents, trademarks, and copyright, as well as those involving the Internet, e-commerce, corporate and secured transactions, computer law, technology transfer, licensing and related services. Our lawyers understand and work with complex technologies in all disciplines, and we have extensive experience with the procedures and requirements of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Most importantly, we take a practical business approach to IP that transcends the details of products and processes and recognizes the use of IP as a business tool. We are skilled at helping companies maximize the value of their intellectual assets by partnering with them in transactions and helping them develop effective business practices that integrate innovation and IP management as a core discipline. Learn more at www.mslaw.com

Proskauer Rose
The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. With one of the largest global client rosters, you can be confident you will be in good company and represented by the best minds in the business.
800 strong, our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success. Business savvy and market driven, our intellectual capital drives success. We are proud of our many achievements across a full spectrum of transactional and contentious practices. We secure victories, help build businesses and set precedents. Proskauer was founded on the same bedrock values that hold true today. Hard work, mutual respect, cooperation, integrity and an unwavering dedication to client service are as integral now as when our doors first opened in 1875.

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (HSF Kramer) was formed in June 2025 through the transformational combination of Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin, creating a world-leading global law firm. With more than 6,000 people including approximately 2,700 lawyers spanning 26 offices, HSF Kramer provides comprehensive legal services across every major region of the world. Uniquely positioned to help clients achieve ambitious objectives, HSF Kramer delivers exceptional results in complex transactions and high-stakes disputes.

Foster Garvey

Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC (ESF)
Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC (ESF) is a boutique IP firm offering customized IP services across all technology areas.
Leveraging cutting edge patent tools, including AI assistance, ESF offers sophisticated IP services at efficient price points, including FTO and monitoring services, portfolio management services, due diligence for M&A deals, and prosecution services. Our FTO strategies minimize defensive litigation risk while our portfolio management strategies support our client’s market positions and IP goals. ESF also competes with and wins numerous USPTO post-grant proceedings against top AmLaw firms, with success rate of over 90%.
We serve a diverse client base, from start-ups to Fortune 500 companies. Our team’s legal and technical experience enables us to serve our clients’ IP-related needs with the utmost skill and confidence.

Harness IP
Harness IP is a prominent intellectual property (IP) law firm headquartered in the United States. With a rich history dating back to 1921, the firm has established itself as a leader in the field of IP law, offering a comprehensive range of services to clients worldwide. Harness IP specializes in various aspects of intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and IP litigation. The firm’s team of experienced attorneys provides strategic counsel and legal representation to assist clients in protecting, managing, and enforcing their intellectual property rights effectively. Known for their expertise, dedication, and commitment to client success, Harness IP attorneys are trusted advisors to businesses, inventors, and innovators seeking to safeguard their intellectual assets in today’s competitive market landscape.

Cleary Gottlieb
Cleary Gottlieb is a leading international law firm, with 16 offices located in major financial centers around the world, that has helped shape the globalization of the legal profession for more than 75 years. Our AI practice is renowned for providing sophisticated interdisciplinary and cross-jurisdictional advice in connection with high-profile, high-value, and often cross-border AI-related matters. Clients from around the world and a wide range of industries rely on the firm’s IP litigation and arbitration experience, and when IP disputes are fought in multiple jurisdictions, Cleary’s global reach sets us apart. Cleary’s innovation stretches to its eDiscovery team that are pioneers in the litigation space using AI, as well as ClearyX, an ALSP that is wholly owned by the Firm, that was founded to reimagine the future of legal services. Cleary’s globally recognized lawyers and professionals have a proven track record for providing work of the highest quality to meet the needs of our domestic and international clients.

Armstrong Teasdale
Armstrong Teasdale, one of the nation’s largest 200 law firms with offices in the United States and China, provides essential business related legal services to clients across a wide range of industries. Intellectual property, our fastest growing practice area, is one of the firm’s core strengths. Our team of more than 80 IP professionals, including 45 attorneys who are registered to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, provides both administrative and litigation counsel in all key areas including copyright, trademark, patent, and trade secrets. In addition to law degrees, many of our IP attorneys have advanced degrees and work-related experience in scientific areas and understand clients’ complex inventions and ideas. We are particularly known for our patent infringement litigation successes, many of which have been obtained in “hotbed” federal districts where high stakes patent suits often land.

Corsearch
Corsearch’s connected solutions span Trademarks, Brand Protection, and Content Protection, helping organizations clear, monitor, and enforce IP across digital and global markets. From AI-powered trademark search and watch to scalable online enforcement and anti-piracy services, we simplify complex IP workflows and deliver clarity in fast-moving environments. Whether you’re managing global trademark portfolios, tackling infringement across online channels, or protecting digital content, Corsearch provides the technology and expert support to take action with speed and confidence. Trusted by more than 5,000 businesses, law firms, and rights holders worldwide, we enable smarter IP decisions and measurable outcomes that align with commercial goals.
Learn more at corsearch.com

Rivkin Radler LLP
Through five offices in the Northeast region and 200 lawyers, Rivkin Radler consistently delivers focused and effective legal services to successful individuals, middle-market companies and large corporations. Now in its 70th year, the nationally recognized firm offers 21 practice areas, and is committed to its best practices, which exceed professional and ethical standards. The work product is clear and delivered on time. As a result, our clients proceed with confidence.

Brown Rudnick
Brown Rudnick is an international full-service law firm with offices in key business centers in the United States and the United Kingdom. We provide legal services to clients across various industries such as artificial intelligence, technology, digital commerce, life sciences, and brand and reputation management. Our approach combines creativity with experience to achieve favorable outcomes for our clients in high-stakes litigation and complex business transactions. We prioritize partner-driven service, encourage collaboration among our lawyers in the best interest of the client, and prioritize excellence over scale. Our focus is on industry-specific, client-facing practices where we have established recognition. In all aspects of client relationships, we aim to bring the full strength of our firm to serve the comprehensive needs of our clients.
Venue
Martinique New York on Broadway
49 W 32nd Street
New York City, NY
Pricing
Register By | In House Counsel | Law Firms & Vendors |
---|---|---|
November 19th | $395.00 | Contact info@centerforceusa.com |
- Payment is due in full at the time of registration and includes lunches, refreshments and detailed conference materials.
- Your registration will not be confirmed until payment is received and may be subject to cancellation.
- You may substitute delegates at any time. CenterForce does not provide refunds for cancellations.
- For cancellations received in writing more than seven (7) days prior to the conference you will receive a 100% credit to be used at another CenterForce conference for up to one year from the date of issuance.
- For cancellations received seven (7) days or less prior to an event (including day 7), no credit will be issued. In the event that CenterForce cancels an event, delegate payments at the date of cancellation will be credited to a future CenterForce event. This credit will be available for up to one year from the date of issuance.
- In the event that CenterForce postpones an event, delegate payments at the postponement date will be credited towards the rescheduled date. If the delegate is unable to attend the rescheduled event, the delegate will receive a 100% credit representing payments made towards a future CenterForce event. This credit will be available for up to one year from the date of issuance. No refunds will be available for cancellations or postponements.
- CenterForce is not responsible for any loss or damage as a result of a substitution, alteration or cancellation/postponement of an event. CenterForce shall assume no liability whatsoever in the event this conference is cancelled, rescheduled or postponed due to a fortuitous event, Act of God, unforeseen occurrence or any other event that renders performance of this conference impracticable or impossible. For purposes of this clause, a fortuitous event shall include, but not be limited to: war, fire, labor strike, extreme weather or other emergency.
- Please note that speakers and topics were confirmed at the time of publishing, however, circumstances beyond the control of the organizers may necessitate substitutions, alterations or cancellations of the speakers and/or topics. As such, CenterForce reserves the right to alter or modify the advertised speakers and/or topics if necessary. Any substitutions or alterations will be updated on our web page as soon as possible.
- All discounts must require payment at time of registration and before the cut-off date in order to receive any discount.
- Any discounts offered whether by CenterForce (including team discounts) must also require payment at the time of registration.
- All discount offers cannot be combined with any other offer.